← Back
Evidence source 5709Spot Checked

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation

Unknown venue2022-09-21Paper
Executive summary

Report on model-free reinforcement learning for asset allocation, comparing various RL agents and baseline models.

What it examines

This study investigates the effectiveness of model-free deep reinforcement learning agents in portfolio management, comparing their performance against baseline models and among themselves to identify the best-performing classes of agents.

What it concludes

The study shows that RL agents can enhance portfolio management, with on-policy, actor-critic agents performing best. Future research could explore other RL agents, hyperparameter optimization, and different neural network architectures.

Extracted from this source

Evidence objects

Evidence 586675% extraction confidence
The study shows that RL agents can enhance portfolio management, with on-policy, actor-critic agents performing best. Future research could explore other RL agents, hyperparameter optimization, and different neural network architectures.

key_findings bullet 1 · key_findings · validation V0

Raw abstract and provenance

Abstract: Asset allocation (or portfolio management) is the task of determining how to optimally allocate funds of a finite budget into a range of financial instruments/assets such as stocks. This study investigated the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) when applied to portfolio management using model-free deep RL agents. We trained several RL agents on real-world stock prices to learn how to perfo… ▽ More Asset allocation (or portfolio management) is the task of determining how to optimally allocate funds of a finite budget into a range of financial instruments/assets such as stocks. This study investigated the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) when applied to portfolio management using model-free deep RL agents. We trained several RL agents on real-world stock prices to learn how to perform asset allocation. We compared the performance of these RL agents against some baseline agents. We also compared the RL agents among themselves to understand which classes of agents performed better. From our analysis, RL agents can perform the task of portfolio management since they significantly outperformed two of the baseline agents (random allocation and uniform allocation). Four RL agents (A2C, SAC, PPO, and TRPO) outperformed the best baseline, MPT, overall. This shows the abilities of RL agents to uncover more profitable trading strategies. Furthermore, there were no significant performance differences between value-based and policy-based RL agents. Actor-critic agents performed better than other types of agents. Also, on-policy agents performed better than off-policy agents because they are better at policy evaluation and sample efficiency is not a significant problem in portfolio management. This study shows that RL agents can substantially improve asset allocation since they outperform strong baselines. On-policy, actor-critic RL agents showed the most promise based on our analysis. △ Less

Source row: 1358 · abstract type: unknown